Screw it... after lunch, let's go to Best Buy |
Amidst this personal struggle, and perhaps in spite of my wife's unexpected support in me pissing money down the drain, I decided to read what other people have said. For the most part the reviews have been positive (Google "3DS review" to see for yourself). They are typically quite comprehensive; evaluating everything from battery life, to controller features, to the plastic shell that contains the hardware. This is all stuff I couldn't care less about, because it is, obviously, the glasses-less 3D screen that sets this device apart from the rest, and the only reason I really want one.
As a casual gaming device, I see incredible potential for the Nintendo 3DS. I want the three-minute bus stop gaming experience, because my lifestyle (simultaneously blessed and encumbered by two small children) allows for little else. As such, I like solitary card/board/Brick-Breaker-type games that I can commence and cast aside as time permits. That said, what does the 3DS offer that existing DS systems do not? Yes, the 3D screen... but why 3D?
Yes, why? |
That question was raised as result of this review. Specifically, the reviewer's assessment of Super Street Fighter IV: 3D Edition:
There's also a new, over-the-shoulder view to help augment the illusion of depth, but it won't take long for serious gamers to revert to the traditional side-view.
3D is cool. There's no doubt about that. But what does it really add to game play? The Street Fighter game wasn't the only one reviewed that gave rise to this question... 3D might be a thousand times cooler than standard 2D game play, but it seems that all the existing titles are equally fun and equally playable in 2D. Before I absorb the expense of a 3DS, I'm going to wait for a game that can only be played in 3D.
Or, better yet, dream one up myself.... |